Within our lifetimes we are confronted with awesome destructive events and tragedies beyond our pedestrian capacities for expressing reactions to them. Such experiences transform us socially, culturally, nationally; even globally. Every historical period contains its own array but our recent Euro-American history has included World War II, the Holocaust, the atomic bombs in Japan, Viet Nam, numerous other tragedies and most recently the destruction of the World Trade Center. In the face of such events we are often rendered speechless; words fail to wholly convey our feelings about them. Why? Because words are too literal to address the sublime depths such experiences evoke. The same holds true for narratives expressing these events in figurative imagery. Even photographs, though compelling enough in documenting tragedy and the resulting horrors, fail to profoundly express deep and universal emotions. Consider World War II and one of its most popular memorials - the Iwo Jima sculpture at Arlington National Cemetery, which is based on a (allegedly staged) documentary photograph. As a larger-than-life, literal depiction, it garners impact from its massive size. The intent was to scale beyond the Pacific island battle referenced to make a huge comprehensive statement about the war. It is perhaps one of the last vestiges of a grand, 19th century, memorial esthetic regarding war. Viet Nam redirected our collective consciousness about war to a consideration beyond heroics. A signifier of the sea change was Maya Lin’s Viet Nam War memorial in Washington D.C. Despite the initial controversy that accompanied the piece, it has become a socially engaging commemorative icon for honoring the war dead. Lin’s wedge of black granite cutting deep into the earth with the inscribed names of the dead is open to many interpretations. Among the latter it has been denounced by some as negative and disrespectful - as legitimate a reading as any other. But a more comprehensive elucidation is that, besides serving as a deeply solemn |